Differences Between Ultherapy and Ultraformer III, which works better?

by | Nov 13, 2021 | Treatments | 0 comments

When it involves non-invasive anti-ageing therapies, many doctors will undoubtedly agree that one of the leading technology is ultrasound, performed with either Ultherapy or Ultraformer III. So what are the primary differences between them? Does one work better than the other? Below is what you require to learn about these modern technologies, how they function, and what separates them.
Both Ultherapy, as well as Ultraformer III, are safe, non-surgical skin-tightening procedures for face lifting as well as skin renewal. In addition, they both use ultrasound technology.
The Similarities 
Ultherapy is a non-invasive ultrasound skin tightening treatment that utilises micro-focused ultrasound power waves to stimulate collagen production.
Ultraformer III is a brand name of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) medical grade machine used for a personalized treatment procedure for face, neck, and body.
Both Ultherapy and UltraFormer III are non-invasive, low downtime treatments for face tightening, lifting, and body sculpting. It works at the SMAS (superficial muscular aponeurotic system) layer, which is a layer of cells deep within the subcutaneous tissue in the skin. The SMAS layer is a crucial support structure for the face, and the refinement of this anatomic structure can transform the look of the face.
Throughout ageing, the body produces much less collagen, bringing about dehydrated skin and the appearance of wrinkles. There is also loss of SMAS membrane layer and reduction of skin elasticity during maturing, thus causing sagging skin. Collagen helps reduce wrinkles and dryness, as well as additionally assists in the production of proteins like elastin as well as fibrillin that assists with skin structuring.
Neocollagenesis is the process where the body generates collagen. Ultraformer III works with the SMAS situated in deep layers below the skin as opposed to surgical procedures. It utilises ultrasound technology to emit energy to the SMAS layer to tighten up and plump the skin cells by delivering concentrated waves of ultrasound right into targeted areas, and
promote neocollagenesis in the face while tightening up body tissues to better shape objectives.
The Differences
Ultraformer III has the unique advantage of having a specialised handpiece that is used to treat sensitive locations, like areas around the eyes and hence can be used to deal with saggy eyes.
In Ultherapy, shots take a longer time to be processed as compared with Ultraformer III. Thus, it takes around 1.5 to 2 times the length of treatment time compared to Ultraformer III, which typically takes 60mins to complete; it is also widely known to be a more comfortable machine of the two compared.
For both Ultherapy and Ultraformer III, the patient can see only about 20% of the results. The results will progressively be more evident in the next 2 to 3 months. Most patients require ONLY one treatment that can last up to 18 months. Still, there are cases of patients needing a 2nd treatment sooner depending upon their skin laxity degree and their biological reaction to the treatment and the collagen-building process. As the skin ages, it will need regular treatments to keep pace with the ageing skin. UltraFormer III will surely give a patient the advantage to age slower.
Ultraformer III HIFU treatment is generally well tolerated. Nonetheless, some patients feel considerable discomfort or slight pain throughout Ultherapy treatment; the impact is a lot lesser on UltraFormer III, according to patients’ feedback. The discomfort is temporary no matter which machine is used as it signals that the collagen-building procedure has begun. Sometimes, the discomfort stems from fear of being in a doctor’s office, having their first treatment, or the machines may look intimidating. Singapore aesthetic clinics ‘ strict laws and guidelines ensure that all aesthetic clinic machines and tools are very safe.
The cost of UltraFormer treatment is also significantly lower compared to Ultherapy. However, there is no need to stick to either Ultherapy or UltraFormer III; being more expensive does not mean it will suit you better. The best advice is to speak to a trusted doctor or try out both treatments to discover what is best for you.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *